<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice loses this round</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quenelle.org/unix/2009/openoffice-loses-this-round/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quenelle.org/unix/2009/openoffice-loses-this-round/</link>
	<description>UNIX developer tools and other cool stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dtkerns</title>
		<link>http://quenelle.org/unix/2009/openoffice-loses-this-round/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>dtkerns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quenelle.org/unix/?p=257#comment-466</guid>
		<description>sorry for late post...

I&#039;m by no means an expert on either OpenOffice or Google Docs, but I&#039;d say it&#039;s an apples to oranges comparison..

OpenOffice was never meant to compete against Google Docs. OpenOffice was meant to be a free replacement for the MS Office suite.

I&#039;m not surprised at all that Google has one-upped/raised the bar. Good for them, good for us, says I!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for late post&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m by no means an expert on either OpenOffice or Google Docs, but I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s an apples to oranges comparison..</p>
<p>OpenOffice was never meant to compete against Google Docs. OpenOffice was meant to be a free replacement for the MS Office suite.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised at all that Google has one-upped/raised the bar. Good for them, good for us, says I!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Quenelle</title>
		<link>http://quenelle.org/unix/2009/openoffice-loses-this-round/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Quenelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quenelle.org/unix/?p=257#comment-457</guid>
		<description>If I wanted to lock an arbitrary rectangle, Window-&gt;Freeze seems logical.  But column headers is such an obvious trivial case it was helpful to have that be especially easy to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I wanted to lock an arbitrary rectangle, Window-&gt;Freeze seems logical.  But column headers is such an obvious trivial case it was helpful to have that be especially easy to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Moffat</title>
		<link>http://quenelle.org/unix/2009/openoffice-loses-this-round/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Moffat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quenelle.org/unix/?p=257#comment-455</guid>
		<description>The Freeze option is obvious to me but then that is what it has been called in many spreadsheet programs all they way back to the earliest I remember using (probably Lotus 123 and its clones but I might have used Visicalc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Freeze option is obvious to me but then that is what it has been called in many spreadsheet programs all they way back to the earliest I remember using (probably Lotus 123 and its clones but I might have used Visicalc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

